St Peter's ward councillor, Cllr Alice Perry, spoke at the 2015 Labour Party Conference in Brighton. Read her speech below -
Our lives our defined by our work, the communities we come from and our most strongly held values and beliefs. Our lives are defied by the people and places we love. The Stronger, Safer Policy commission covers the issues at the heart of what matters to us most.
May’s General Election defeat was devastating. Some of us still feel in shock at the prospect of what another five year’s of a Conservative Government means for our communities.
Labour’s general election defeat has been particularly hard for all of us in local government. Councils have had their funding cut dramatically since the Tories came to power in 2010. These reckless cuts to Council budgets endanger vital public services. We must come together as a Labour movement to oppose them.
But despite the massive cuts to our budgets, Labour Councillors continue to make a huge positive difference to our communities. Despite enormous cuts to our funding, Councillors continue to demonstrate the positive difference voting Labour makes.
Together we continue to champion policies that make a real difference to people, policies like:
- Building new affordable Council housing
- Tackling rouge landlords
- Paying workers the living wage – the real living wage
- Helping residents reduce energy bills and tackling fuel poverty
- Securing new jobs and apprenticeships, and helping people back to work
- tackling payday lending
- promoting the use of credit unions
- regenerating our communities
- supporting local businesses
- Supporting our armed forces and honouring those who have served our country
- Developing new models of integrated health and social care
- Providing free school meals to school children
- Pioneering new ways of improving public health
- Using ethical procurement policies and challenging companies guilty of blacklisting workers.
- Improving roads and access to transport
- And supporting refugees
If people want to know why they should vote Labour, they should look at what we are doing in local government.
Remember when David Cameron forgot what football team he is supposed to pretend to support? David Cameron doesn’t really get football, he just doesn’t understand.
Labour, however recognise that football clubs are not businesses, instead they belong to their communities. They are an important part of many people’s cultural identity and sense of belonging.
But despite football club’s importance in the lives of their members and supporters, too often there are no effective means for fans to have a say in how their clubs are run. Labour’s 2015 manifesto planned to introduce legislation to enable accredited supporters trusts to appoint and remove at least two of the directors of a football club and to purchase shares when the club changes hands.
The principal of supporters on the boards of football clubs reflects our wider values and should also pave the way for places for workers on the boards of companies. The plans were symbolic of the wider narrative – that the Labour Party is prepared to take power away from a self-interested elite and this give power back to our communities.
We know the next five years are going to be incredibly tough. Unless something very dramatic happens we are out of national government until 2020. But despite massive, unfair cuts from the Tory government, that hit the most deprived areas hardest, Labour Councils still deliver.
We run many of the UK’s major cities, towns and regions. In many areas Labour’s Councillors are the last line of defend against this Tory government. There are many, vital local elections between now and 2020. Our 7,000 Councillors are leading the Labour fightback.
St Peter's ward councillor, Cllr Alice Perry, spoke at the 2015 Labour Party Conference in Brighton. Read her speech below - Our lives our defined by our work, the communities...
On Tuesday 29th September, Islington North MP, Jeremy Corbyn, gave his first speech to Labour Party Conference as Leader of the Labour Party.
Following Jeremy's victory in the Leadership contest, he has set out his new direction of honest, straight talking politics.
Jeremy's speech showed that it’s time for grown-up politics as he set out how Labour will build a better, more caring and prosperous society based on the values of decency, justice and equality.
We are building a new politics that involves real debate. A vision rooted in British values and committed to mutual respect.
Jeremy showed that Labour can provide a real alternative to the Tories’ failed austerity, by investing for the future and giving economic security to families – campaigning against tax credit cuts, and looking at new ways to support Britain’s growing number of self-employed people.
Watch Jeremy's speech here -
Jeremy was introduced before his speech in Brighton by 19 year old Islington resident, Rohi Malik. Rohi lives in Tufnell Park and her father came to Britain in the early 1980s as a refugee from Pakistan.
Rohi was interviewed by Labour MP, Cat Smith, and you can watch the video here -
On Tuesday 29th September, Islington North MP, Jeremy Corbyn, gave his first speech to Labour Party Conference as Leader of the Labour Party. Following Jeremy's victory in the Leadership contest,...
On Saturday 12th September, Islington North MP Jeremy Corbyn, was elected as the new Leader of the Labour Party.
Cllr Richard Watts, Leader of Islington Council, welcomed Jeremy Corbyn MP’s election, saying:
“I want to wish Jeremy my sincere congratulations on his election as Leader of the Labour Party. Jeremy’s victory was stunning and is good news for Islington.
“Jeremy has been a friend and colleague for many years, working closely with the council as we work to make a difference for ordinary working people in Islington.
“The Labour Party has voted for a new kind of politics, and for urgent action on the issues that really matter like building more genuinely affordable homes, helping people into work, and tackling the cost of living; all issues we have been working with Jeremy on for years.
“I look forward to continuing to work with Jeremy to deliver for Islington, and to getting rid of this Tory Government.”
On Saturday 12th September, Islington North MP Jeremy Corbyn, was elected as the new Leader of the Labour Party. Cllr Richard Watts, Leader of Islington Council, welcomed Jeremy Corbyn MP’s...
Leader of Islington Council, Cllr Richard Watts, has today called on residents to join him in calling on the Government to deliver real action on the refugee crisis.
Cllr Watts said:
Islington, London, and Britain as a country, has always understood that people facing persecution or fleeing conflict have a home here. Sadly, the Government has forgotten this.
That's why Islington must come together to put pressure on the Government to offer help and a home to refugees.
Please join me in signing this petition calling on the Government to increase support for refugees and to accept more people seeking asylum.
Islington Council has been working with London Citizens since November 2014 to agree how our borough can play its part in helping refugees fleeing the war in Syria. But our plans to help people have been blocked by the Government who need to agree to take more refugees and provide proper financial support for communities willing to receive people.
No one could fail to be moved by the images we have seen in the last few days. My sons are about the same age as Aylan and Galip Kurdi, whose deaths have so shocked the world. I held my sons extra closely last night. But tweeting our shock, outrage, and disbelief, is not enough. We have to demand real action is taken and that starts with the Government.
Join me in signing the petition today.
You can also make a donation via Unicef here.
Leader of Islington Council, Cllr Richard Watts, has today called on residents to join him in calling on the Government to deliver real action on the refugee crisis. Cllr Watts...
Islington Council is set to investigate how companies that avoid paying UK tax can be barred from council contracts.
The Policy and Performance Scrutiny Committee will report before Christmas after calling-in large companies that have been accused of tax avoidance to answer councillors’ questions.
The ‘scrutiny review’ follows the pioneering work of the same committee which led to the first anti-blacklisting policy adopted by the council in 2014.
Chair of the Committee, Cllr Troy Gallagher, commented: “Tax avoidance is a disgrace and deprives the country of billions of pounds each year. At a time of massive cuts from the Government to Islington, we need to make sure that big companies are paying their fair share of tax.”
The committee will identify companies that the council currently contracts with that are allegedly avoiding tax, and investigate how procurement processes could be updated to ensure that these companies do not win Council contracts.
The investigation will also seek to understand how companies are avoiding UK tax and what powers, such as licensing powers, the council has to influence companies’ behaviour.
Following an investigation by the Policy and Performance Scrutiny Committee in March 2014, Islington Council became the first council to take decisive action against firms that had been involved in the practice of blacklisting. Blacklisting is the illegal practice of denying employment to individuals on the basis of information, accurate or not, which is held on a database. Firms who want council contracts must now show they do not practise blacklisting, and those who have used blacklisting in the past must prove they have ceased and taken sufficient measures to remedy their past wrongs. Any council contractor caught practising blacklisting in the future will have their contract terminated.
Cllr Gallagher added: “The pioneering work the committee did on blacklisting is something we will build on as we call time on tax avoiders. We will be hearing evidence from tax experts, council managers, and will be requesting input from HMRC and others.
“People in Islington know that it is only fair to ask companies to pay their tax; it’s time we made sure the council does all it can to tackle tax avoidance.”
Islington Council is set to investigate how companies that avoid paying UK tax can be barred from council contracts. The Policy and Performance Scrutiny Committee will report before Christmas after...
Two ground-breaking policies have been announced this week by Islington Labour to help deliver more homes for local people.
Since 2010, we have seen 2,000 genuinely affordable homes built - including council homes for social rent - and Islington Labour is committed to delivering a further 1,500 new affordable homes. Despite the largest affordable homes building programme in a generation, like the rest of London, Islington faces a housing crisis.
Part of the problem we face in Islington is developers using unclear 'financial viability' assessments to reduce the amount of affordable housing required as part of new building projects. This is part of what happened at Mount Pleasant when the Mayor delivered only a fraction of the affordable housing we needed.
Under our policies, the council always secures the most affordable housing it can, and this week launched a new front in the battle to deliver the homes local people need. Since changes by the Tory Government in 2012 were brought in, it has become more common for developers to use excuses through 'viability assessments' to claim they cannot afford to build affordable homes.
In ground-breaking new guidance to developers, a number of measures will help us to what is right for Islington when assessing viability. You can read more about the new guidelines here.
But Islington Labour's action to tackle the housing crisis doesn't end here. In a separate pioneering move, the council has announced new rules to tackle the scourge of 'buy-to-leave' - where homes are bought and never lived in, before being sold on - denying local people housing.
By requiring developers to ensure that evidence is produced that homes are regularly lived-in, these new policies will aim to reduce the 'wasted supply' from these homes not being used to provide homes for local people. You can read more about these policies here.
Commenting on these new policies, Cllr James Murray, Executive Member for Housing and Development, said:
"Islington, like London, is facing a housing crisis and it's vital that all new homes help meet the huge demand for places to live.
"Our new measures make it clear that "buy-to-leave" is unacceptable. They make clear that new homes have to, at the very least, be lived in - I think that's a pretty reasonable thing to ask.
“There is growing evidence some developers use ‘viability assessments’ to their advantage, such as inflating land costs to say they can’t afford to build affordable housing.
“Our new rules make sure developers can’t game the system. We want to make the system transparent, clear, and fair, to help make sure the affordable housing we badly need is built.”
Two ground-breaking policies have been announced this week by Islington Labour to help deliver more homes for local people. Since 2010, we have seen 2,000 genuinely affordable homes built -...
At the Full Council Meeting on 25th June, Islington councillors came together to oppose plans by One Housing Group to evict tenants from their home in Park Street.
Local ward councillors, Cllr Gary Poole and Cllr Angela Picknell, spoke movingly about the residents' campaign and why this battle matters to all of Islington.
Here are Cllr Poole's and Cllr Picknell's speeches that they delivered on the night, speaking in support of a motion that was passed by the meeting, calling on One Housing to drop their plans.
Cllr Gary Poole -
Mr Mayor, I am very grateful that you have provided this opportunity to debate the urgent and distressing situation that is affecting a very special and significant community in Islington Park Street in my Ward. This situation is a true emergency in the sense of a current and pressing threat to a group of residents, many of whom are here tonight, who are facing the destruction of their way of living, and their principled existence. But it is also an emergency for the whole Borough because if we loose this Community we will be witnessing the degradation of the values of tolerance, equality and freedom for which our Borough stands. Mr Mayor the fight to save Islington Park Street Community is a battle for the very soul of our Borough.
The Islington Park Street Community was established in 1976 by Patchwork Housing and has stayed true to it’s original founding aim to provide supported living for low-income single adults. For nearly 40 years it has continued this existence and kept true to these values, for nearly 40 years its residents have thrived and lived in security, for nearly 40 years they have paid their rent and kept the property in good order. And now One Housing have decided that this Community no longer fits within their business model, and that 40 years of accumulated material and emotional investment by residents counts for nothing. Of course, One Housing claim that they merely want to empty the property in order address ‘maintenance matters requiring closer attention’. And yet One Housing appear reluctant to speak with residents about the substantive issues offering only to speak to them about the practicalities of the ‘decanting’. Mr Mayor you can quite easily suppose what the real intentions of the landlord might be. With property prices soaring in this Borough, 38-44 Islington Park Street, is an asset that must be realised. The long standing community, living at the property for decades, have become an inconvenient reality. Their existence doesn’t fit neatly into any sales brochure, and in the ambiguity there is an attempt to diminish their status as tenants and make them easy prey to be moved on. Residents now have 10 days to quit; 10 days before legal proceedings will be initiated. I ask members to imagine the situation facing older residents in this community in particular who have lived in a home that is not just bricks and mortar but which represents support and care, but who now face the destruction of that reality. If we came into public service for anything, then surely it was to stand up for people in these situations and to fight for the values of equality, diversity and freedom.
Members should be under no illusions that other landlords will be watching this fight and watching what One Housing are up to. We know already that pressure is mounting to raise rents and sell off social housing, and if we loose the Islington Park Street Community then surely we will have taken yet another step along the road towards the decimation of the principles of social housing. This community is emblematic of everything our Borough stands for and if it disappears we will all be diminished. Yes the Community are different and yes they adhere to a way of living that sits outside the mainstream, but if there was ever a place where this type of community was valued, then surely it must be Islington
So Mr Mayor I hope tonight this Council will unite in standing up for this special community; that we will unite to fight for the values that are inherent within it., and that we will make a powerful statement that we will not tolerate social vandalism like this in our Borough.
Cllr Angela Picknell -
This community is not a squat; it's not some well-meaning but inefficient commune that's run to seed and lost the plot. The original tenants of 39-44 Islington Park Street were, nearly 40 years ago, given a promise, by Patchwork Housing, of a secure home for their lifetime. The various tenants who have come and gone since then have lived under that original agreement - not just a legal or financial one, but also an agreement to share in and uphold the humane, supportive values of the man who founded patchwork housing.
St Mary's councillors have met many of the current tenants and we've been to their home. It's clear that they have lived up to their responsibilities: kept the building clean and decent, facilitated repairs where necessary and got along with and supported each other.
But they have been accused by OHG of being uncooperative and intransigent, giving the false impression that the threatened eviction is a landlord's last resort.
In truth, it is OHG who failed to take part in mediation in 2010, and who have avoided coming to an agreement that could re-establish these homes as part of Islington's desperately needed pool of social housing, that could be paid for at an acceptable social rent and allocated, when vacancies arise, to Islington residents.
We invite OHG to engage in talks. To do what they were established to do -especially here in Islington in this instance, where there is so little land to build from scratch, and where every bit of social housing has to be fought for against the profit margins of private developers - to maintain and provide homes for those who can't afford the obscene levels of private rents in their borough.
This council feels that there is a need for a wider campaign involving all of OHG's tenants in Islington and beyond, so that together they can form a defence against the possibility of more such shameful practices of this kind.
At the Full Council Meeting on 25th June, Islington councillors came together to oppose plans by One Housing Group to evict tenants from their home in Park Street. Local ward...
Islington's Executive Member for Finance and Performance, Cllr Andy Hull, writes about the Tory Government's summer budget.
Welfare reforms brought in by the government since 2010 have already hit our community in Islington hard. The council has sought to respond through the ground-breaking work of its IMAX social security advisers, its iWork employment coaches, its award-winning Shine energy initiative and its innovative Families First programme. The £12bn of further welfare cuts announced by the government in this week’s budget though will leave many more residents struggling to cope and cash-strapped local services less able to help them.
Recent modelling carried out by the council shows that the Chancellor’s plans to cut the benefit cap by £3,000 from £26,000 to £23,000 will hit an additional 575 households in the borough, on top of the 250 already affected by the current cap, and could impoverish 1,000 more local children.
The budget also commits the government to:
- Cutting working tax credits, expected to hit 45% of working families nationwide
- Freezing local housing allowance, meaning housing benefit will not keep up with rising private sector rents
- Turning maintenance grants for students into loans, threatening to deter poorer students from going to university
This budget represents an attack on families and those in low-paid work, as the government looks to balance the nation’s books on the backs of the poor. When people fall through the increasingly threadbare safety net, it is councils that are left to pick up the pieces at the taxpayer’s expense. But how are we meant to do that when our own budgets are being cut to the bone?
Cllr Hull tweets at @AndyHull79
Islington's Executive Member for Finance and Performance, Cllr Andy Hull, writes about the Tory Government's summer budget. Well unfair Welfare reforms brought in by the government since 2010 have already...
Plans by the Tory Government to cut the benefit cap could see 1,000 more children in Islington pushed into poverty.
Today's Budget, set to be announced by George Osborne, will include a cut in the amount of social security a household can receive in London by £3,000 per year. Research by Islington Council has shown that almost 600 more households in the borough would be affected by the reduction, on top of around 250 families that are already hit by the current cap.
The council's research has found that up to 1,000 more children in Islington could be pushed into poverty, in a borough that already has one of the highest rates of child poverty in the country.
Cllr Andy Hull, Executive Member for Finance and Performance, commented: "According to the government, the benefit cap is meant to reflect the average income. But average earnings haven’t dropped by £3,000, so why are they cutting this support from families who need it?
"This national, one-size-fits-all policy takes no account of local realities. Rents in London are much higher than elsewhere, and yet the same caps and cuts apply. With such a shortage of affordable housing in the capital, cutting the benefit cap won’t drive down rents; it will just drive people into poverty."
Cllr Hull added: “For Islington, the Government cutting the benefit cap will mean huge losses of around £1.6 million in Housing Benefit – likely to translate into a big rise in tenants’ arrears. At a time when the council’s budget is stretched to breaking point, we can’t guarantee to cover the loss.
"We call on the Government to stop this cut in its tracks. Failing that, we need the Government to provide us with additional Discretionary Housing Payment funds to help us cover the shortfall. We will do our best to support struggling families in our community, but there’s a limit to our ability to shoulder the burden of government cuts and shield residents from their impact.”
Plans by the Tory Government to cut the benefit cap could see 1,000 more children in Islington pushed into poverty. Today's Budget, set to be announced by George Osborne, will...
Cllr Alice Perry, St Peter's ward, writes about the importance of tackling the practice of 'blacklisting' -
Our lives our defined by our work, the communities we come from and our most strongly held values and beliefs. Defending and strengthening our rights at work is at the heart of what it means to be Labour. Back in 2009, the Information Commissioner exposed details of a large-scale surveillance operation run by a company called The Consulting Association. This company collated files on thousands of construction workers and sold the information to 44 construction companies.
Blacklisting is the illegal practice of systematically denying individuals employment on the basis of information, accurate or not, held on some kind of database. While it has been a serious blight on the construction industry for many decades, the discovery of this database was concrete proof of a massive national blacklisting scandal.
The raid resulted in the closure of the database, which had been used to record details of union activity and health and safety campaigning by construction workers. In some cases, just attending a meeting was enough to get you blacklisted from future employment.
The list contained over 3,000 names of workers, many of whom had had their lives ruined as a result. As the GMB point out “Blacklisting has devastating effects, including lengthy periods of unemployment, and being forced to retrain to work in other industries. Not only does this cause financial hardship for the person blacklisted, but also for anyone who is dependent on that person’s career.”
A national campaign led by Trade Unions like the UCATT, the GMB and Unite has sought to achieve justice and compensation for those affected, as well as calling for a full public inquiry and for companies guilty of blacklisting to be barred from tendering for publicly procured contracts.
Shockingly, around half of the workers on this secret database still do not know they were victims of blacklisting. As a society, we cannot turn a blind eye to this unjust, illegal practice.
Many Councils across the country have passed motions against blacklisting and supported the national anti-blacklisting campaign. In 2013 Islington Council wanted to look into what additional practical measures could be taken. Due to the scale of the practice and the terrible impact this had on the lives of thousands of workers, we investigated how local authorities could avoid doing business with companies guilty of blacklisting who had not self-cleansed (e.g. providing detailed evidence of the steps taken to remedy past damage done and prevent future occurrence.)
As a council, we adopted the following changes to its procurement policy:
- The Council will now not enter into contracts with companies implicated in ‘blacklisting’ unless they can demonstrate that they have ‘self cleansed’ and taken adequate measures to remedy past damage done and prevent future occurrence.
- The Council is amending its standard contract terms and conditions to introduce a new clause on ‘blacklisting’ to make explicit the link between ‘blacklisting’ by the contractor (or any sub-contractors that they engage) and the Council’s ability to terminate the contract.
- If during a tender process, a candidate is unable to declare that they have never ‘blacklisted’, they will now be required to prove to the Council’s satisfaction that they have ‘self-cleansed’.
I am delighted that other Councils have adopted similar procurement processes to tackle blacklisting. It is great to see so many Labour Councils adopting ethical procurement processes. If Labour had won the election the party had promised a full enquiry into blacklisting. We should continue to campaign for this and supportthe ongoing major legal action. There is also a lot we can do right now in local government to challenge this disgraceful practice, hold guilty companies to account and fight for justice for thousands of workers.
Cllr Alice Perry, St Peter's ward, writes about the importance of tackling the practice of 'blacklisting' - Our lives our defined by our work, the communities we come from and...